- FASTEST VIDEO CONVERTER GPU HOW TO
- FASTEST VIDEO CONVERTER GPU SOFTWARE
- FASTEST VIDEO CONVERTER GPU BLUETOOTH
I'll take the quality over the speed most every time.Ĭlick to expand.Speaking of people that have no clue what they're talking about.
![fastest video converter gpu fastest video converter gpu](https://www.videoproc.com/video-process/article-images/videoproc-47x-faster.jpg)
I've seen hundreds of test encodes done with the latest GPU encoders as well as the CPU-based hardware encoders (like Intel's QuickSync, I'm now waiting to see what Kaby Lake can do based on quality) and so far, after the past decade of waiting to get some really decent hardware-based encoders, I've yet to see any of them produce outstanding visual quality in comparison to traditional software-based encoders like x264 and now x265. Sure you can encode stuff fast as fuck with the GPU - I have a Sandy Bridge i7 and can use Intel's QuickSync and encode something at 400+ fps but the overall quality of the resulting encode (even with the best settings) is absolute shit compared to just letting x264 crunch away at it at 20 fps.
![fastest video converter gpu fastest video converter gpu](https://www.igorslab.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/nvenc-on-turing.png)
No matter what settings you decide to use with a GPU encoder, even maxing out the possible quality, it's still going to look inferior to what the software-based encoder ends up producing.
FASTEST VIDEO CONVERTER GPU SOFTWARE
Since it's alive again, I'll just say this: there is no GPU encoder that's in use so far that matches the quality of the software encoders IMO. If you have to fallback on CPU methods, it's not the end of the world - although realtime encoding still favors GPU. Hardware encoding/decoding became such a big deal that every nvidia card since Maxwell now carries dedicated h264/HEVC hardware for encoding and decoding. The irony here is that CUDA encoders (& decoders) are fairly obsolete now. What 3 years of experience and advancements can bring. Speaking as a developer back then, CUDA was hard to understand.
![fastest video converter gpu fastest video converter gpu](https://www.videoconverterfactory.com/hd-video-converter/img-guide/get-hardware-acceleration-when-convert-video-files-1.jpg)
I recall a lot of "It's too hard" or "It's not worth the effort" converstations back then. I see the primary issue back in 2012-2013 was a lack of understanding and experience on the developers part.
FASTEST VIDEO CONVERTER GPU HOW TO
If you don't understand the problem or can not figure out how to "divide and conquer", you'll most likely end up wasting your development time better spent elsewhere. The common fallacy is you can solve every CPU bottleneck problem by brute forcing your way onto a GPU. Basically, as a developer, if you didn't fully understand the nvidia gpu architecture, what a Warp is, etc. Getting good performance out of a ton of double precision float math operations was still tricky (hello memory banking tricks). We didn't get Unified Memory until CUDA 6.0, which was just coming out at the very end of 2013. In 2012-2013, CUDA 5.x was the latest and greatest (we're on CUDA 7.x today). Keep in mind that back in 2012, CUDA support in anything was a rare thing. question was "what is the best converter that supports GPU" so stop bumbling about some nonsense, either answer or don't post. kids nowdays just have no idea what they are blabbering about and it's so funny how people keep going offtopic. convert it into binary and data is identical. there is NO difference in quality when rendering with cpu or gpu.
FASTEST VIDEO CONVERTER GPU BLUETOOTH
so i'd rather use gpu than cpu.Īlso those people are fools who say that cpu renders better quality, do you even know what you saying LOL? it's as good as saying that when typing this text with bluetooth keyboard then text quality is worse haha. 6700k goes up to 75c with liquid cooling while gtx 1080 sits in cool 62c max when under 100% use. prolly won't fry the cpu, but it's a good way of reducing your cpu life span greatly. So I have about 30gb of videos to convert and doing that with CPU is just waste of time and it will fry my cpu when i leave it for like 24h under max stress.
![fastest video converter gpu fastest video converter gpu](https://img.movavi.com/movavi.com.12/images/how-to/en/xilisoft-video-converter-review/graph.png)
all my machines and players have issues with mkv (tried win xp, win 7, win 10 and with players such as BSPlayer, win media player, Kodi, VLC, winamp). i don't know why kids nowdays use mkv, it's worst format i've ever came across with. i mean they play, but they stutter and audio keeps drifting on some episodes. I only came here because i have x-files season 1 - 9 and they are in some stupid mkv format that don't play in any of the players I have. cpu pulls about 15000p/s while gpu pulls 420000p/s. I have tried cracking wpa2 handshakes with cpu and gpu. clearly those people have no experience with decent GPUs, stop using some low-end toys and get a decent GPU lol Those clowns saying that CPU is faster FACEPALM 1000x so funny. I have i7-6700k and GTX 1080, 1080 is about 30 times faster than 6700k, actually more. It looks like very old topic, but I just wanted to say that you guys are in complete nutz and in denial about what CUDA support does.